The Generality and Exclusivity of International Political Sociology: A Response to Jan Daniel and Dagmar Rychnovská
AbstractThe paper responds to Jan Daniel and Dagmar Rychnovská’s article from Mezinárodní vztahy 1/2015, whose aim was to establish International Political Sociology (IPS) as a specific strand within critical security studies. This project is criticised in the paper for three reasons. First, the definition of IPS through common features is so general that most critical research could fit in the IPS category. Second, the attempt to define IPS by negation is grounded in a distorted image of discursive approaches to international politics. Third, the label is deployed in a way that excludes a range of related authors not only from IPS, but even from the ‘main currents’ of critical security studies. Rather than being an analytical category, IPS is thus more like a political tool through which a distorted and exclusionary image of the discipline is being constructed.
Mezinárodní vztahy / Czech Journal of International Relations publishes under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. Anyone is allowed to use, share, copy, distribute, or display the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The journal allows others to copy, distribute and display only original copies of our publications.